Darmer v. Jenkins-Jones et al
| Steven Darmer |
| State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
| 0:2017cv04309 |
| September 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Ramsey |
| Katherine M. Menendez |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
402
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 367 Motion in Limine; denying 393 Motion in Limine(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 3/11/2022. (KKM)
|
|
Filing
343
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and overruling 326 Plaintiff's objections to 327 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 4/6/2020. (HAZ)
|
|
Filing
341
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and awarding defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company attorney's fees and costs as a sanction. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 4/1/2020. (HAZ)
|
|
Filing
331
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 275 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 286 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 1/31/2020. (HAZ)
|
|
Filing
321
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting in part 233 Motion for Sanctions. See written opinion for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 10/28/2019. (BJP)
|
|
Filing
319
ORDER denying 239 Motion to Compel; denying 239 Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiff, his counsel, or both shall pay State Farm its reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, of $4,000 incurred in opposing the combined motion. (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 9/13/2019. (BJP)
|
|
Filing
219
ORDER granting 62 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings; granting 116 motion to modify scheduling order. See order for details. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 11/21/2018. (BJP)
|
|
Filing
218
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 116 Motion to Compel; denying 116 Motion for Sanctions; deferring ruling on 116 Motion for Protective Order; deferring ruling on 116 Motion to Alter/Amend/Correct Other Orders; granting in part and denying in part 195 Motion to Compel. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 10/5/2018. (BJP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Darmer v. Jenkins-Jones et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Darmer | |
| Represented By: | Edward E Beckmann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | Michelle D Christensen |
| Represented By: | Scott G Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
