Turna v. Mayo Clinic
Plaintiff: Tarlochan S. Turna
Defendant: Mayo Clinic
Case Number: 0:2018cv00547
Filed: February 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Goodhue
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Presiding Judge: Wilhelmina M. Wright
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for specifics. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 4/16/2019. (RMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turna v. Mayo Clinic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tarlochan S. Turna
Represented By: Emily Lacy Marshall
Represented By: M William O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?