Morales v. PET Investments, LLC
Plaintiff: Raquel Morales
Defendant: PET Investments, LLC
Case Number: 0:2018cv00734
Filed: March 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Presiding Judge: Tony N. Leung
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER on 16 Stipulation & PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 10/26/2018. (Erickson, Justin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morales v. PET Investments, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raquel Morales
Represented By: Ryan T Conners
Represented By: Daniel Gray Leland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PET Investments, LLC
Represented By: Daniel R Hall
Represented By: Mary L Knoblauch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?