Juvalips, LLC v. Shenzhen Mexi Technology Co., Limited
Plaintiff: Juvalips, LLC
Defendant: Shenzhen Mexi Technology Co., Limited
Case Number: 0:2018cv01872
Filed: July 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Anoka
Presiding Judge: Patrick J Schiltz
Referring Judge: David T Schultz
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shenzhen Mexi Technology Co., Limited (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6206952) filed by Juvalips, LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lawder, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juvalips, LLC v. Shenzhen Mexi Technology Co., Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shenzhen Mexi Technology Co., Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juvalips, LLC
Represented By: Joseph S Lawder
Represented By: Ernest W Grumbles, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?