American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. Brasscraft Manufacturing Company
| American Family Insurance Company and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. |
| Brasscraft Manufacturing Company |
| 0:2018cv01928 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David S Doty |
| Tony N Leung |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per Civil 3rd, 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 18-cv-1928 (DSD/TNL). (MMP) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Brasscraft Manufacturing Company re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Jasper, Bryce) Modified text on 7/10/2018 (MMP). |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Masco Corporation is a corporate parent of Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (Jasper, Bryce) Modified text on 7/10/2018 (MMP). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Scott County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6218461) filed by Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jasper, Bryce) Modified text on 7/10/2018 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
