Soo Line Railroad Company v. Southern Towing Company, LLC
Plaintiff: Soo Line Railroad Company
Defendant: Southern Towing Company, LLC
Case Number: 0:2018cv02442
Filed: August 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Referring Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Daniel E DeKoter for Soo Line Railroad Company. Approved by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 8/24/2018. (JGK)
August 22, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel E. DeKoter, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6323414 filed by Soo Line Railroad Company. (Warner, Stephen) Modified text/event on 8/22/2018 (JGK).
August 21, 2018 Filing 6 FILED IN ERROR - AFFIDAVIT of Daniel E. DeKoter in SUPPORT OF #5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel E. DeKoter. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6323414 filed by Soo Line Railroad Company.(Warner, Stephen) Modified text on 8/22/2018 (JGK).
August 21, 2018 Filing 5 FILED IN ERROR - MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel E. DeKoter. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6323414 filed by Soo Line Railroad Company. (Warner, Stephen) Modified text on 8/22/2018 (JGK).
August 21, 2018 Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Daniel E. DeKoter as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (kt)
August 21, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Southern Towing Company, LLC. (kt)
August 21, 2018 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelosn per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 18-cv-2442 SRN/KMM. (kt)
August 21, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT in Admiralty against Southern Towing Company, LLC (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6322965) filed by Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Warner, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Soo Line Railroad Company v. Southern Towing Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Soo Line Railroad Company
Represented By: Stephen M Warner
Represented By: Daniel E DeKoter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Towing Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?