U.S. Bank National Association v. M&T Bank
| U.S. Bank National Association |
| M&T Bank |
| 0:2018cv02628 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Steven E Rau |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
(Text-only) ORDER on #11 Stipulation. Pursuant to the Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (ECF No. 11), entered into by the parties, seeking an extension of time for Defendant to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation (ECF No. 11) is ADOPTED and that Defendant shall move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter on or before November 28, 2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 11/8/2018. (MME)
|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 Stipulation. (Rowell, Kristin) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint - Second by M&T Bank. Jointly Signed by US Bank National Association. (Rowell, Kristin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter McElligott on behalf of M&T Bank. (McElligott, Peter) |
|
Filing 9
(Text-only) ORDER on #7 Stipulation. Defendant shall move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter on or before 11/8/2018. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 10/9/2018. (MME)
|
| Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 Stipulation. (Rowell, Kristin) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint by M&T Bank. Jointly Signed by US Bank National Association. (Rowell, Kristin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristin B Rowell on behalf of M&T Bank. (Rowell, Kristin) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by U.S. Bank National Association re #4 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint (Hofman, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to M&T Bank. (MMP) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil 3rd, 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 18-cv-2628 (PJS/SER). (MMP) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT Civl Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint. (Hofman, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M&T Bank (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6357966) filed by U.S. Bank National Association. Filer requests summons issued. (Hofman, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. Bank National Association v. M&T Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association | |
| Represented By: | Kevin D Hofman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: M&T Bank | |
| Represented By: | Peter McElligott |
| Represented By: | Kristin B Rowell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
