Spencer v. Marques

Plaintiff: Antwoyn Spencer
Defendant: R. Marques
Case Number: 0:2019cv00133
Filed: January 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Referring Judge: Patrick J Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Voluntary Dismissal filed by Antwoyn Spencer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKL) Document QC'd by KMH on 2/5/19 (KMH).
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 42 USC 1983 COMPLAINT against R. Marques filed by Antwoyn Spencer. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Fifth Division Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Order signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 1/17/19) (kt)cc: Spencer. (kt) Modified text on 1/17/2019 (kt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spencer v. Marques
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antwoyn Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Marques
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?