Henin v. Soo Line Railroad
Plaintiff: Kenneth Henin
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific and Soo Line Railroad
Case Number: 0:2019cv00336
Filed: February 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Paul A Magnuson
Referring Judge: Becky R Thorson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 20101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Fredric A Bremseth on behalf of Kenneth Henin. (Bremseth, Fredric)
February 28, 2019 Filing 11 TEXT ENTRY ONLY NOTICE: Due to the pending motion, there is good cause to delay setting a Rule 16 conference at this time. (MSK)
February 28, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Motion Hearing set for 6/4/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7D (STP) before Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson. (Oberdorfer, Daniel)
February 28, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Soo Line Railroad. (Oberdorfer, Daniel)
February 27, 2019 Filing 8 AMENDED ORDER: In re dispositive motion practice in cases assigned to Judge Magnuson, signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on October 1, 2014.(JEP)
February 20, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Oberdorfer on behalf of Soo Line Railroad. (Oberdorfer, Daniel)
February 20, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret M Bauer Reyes on behalf of Soo Line Railroad. (Reyes, Margaret)
February 20, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracey Holmes Donesky on behalf of Soo Line Railroad. (Donesky, Tracey)
February 19, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Kenneth Henin re #1 Complaint , Return of Service Executed served on Soo Line Railroad on 02/19/2019, filed by Kenneth Henin. (Bremseth, Fredric)
February 12, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Soo Line Railroad. (JLB)
February 12, 2019 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Paul A. Magnuson per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 19-cv-336 PAM/BRT. (JLB)
February 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6665318) filed by Kenneth Henin. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bremseth, Fredric)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henin v. Soo Line Railroad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad
Represented By: Tracey Holmes Donesky
Represented By: Margaret M Bauer Reyes
Represented By: Daniel Oberdorfer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Henin
Represented By: Fredric A Bremseth
Represented By: Keith E Ekstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?