Spicer v. Roy et al
| Gary Spicer |
| Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does, Emily Johnson Piper, Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson and Minnesota Sentencing Commission |
| 0:2019cv00447 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| David T Schultz |
| Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail not re-sent to Gary Spicer. (kt) |
Filing 4
ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 3/28/2019. (TJB) cc: Gary Spicer. Modified text on 3/28/2019 (JLB).
|
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail not re-sent to Gary Spicer(CLK) |
|
Filing 2
Copy of ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Originally filed in Case 18-cv-3255 (DWF/LIB) on 2/22/2019. Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 2/22/2019. cc: Spicer with IFP application.(JLB)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane and John Does, Nancy Johnston, Minnesota Attorney General, Minnesota Sentencing Commission, Emily Johnson Piper, Thomas Roy, Lori Swanson filed by Gary Spicer. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per Civil (5th - Prisoner: Civil Detainee) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) cc: NEF to Spicer. (JLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
