Whipple v. Schnell et al
| Michael R. Whipple |
| Nancy Johnston, Kelly Lyn Mitchell, Tony Lourey, Keith Ellison, Jane and John Does and Paul Schnell |
| 0:2019cv00936 |
| April 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Joan N Ericksen |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Michael R. Whipple re #1 Complaint, #3 Affidavit in Support of Motion, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Michael R. Whipple (JLB) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Michael Whipple in SUPPORT OF #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Michael R. Whipple filed by Michael R. Whipple.(JLB) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Michael R. Whipple. (JLB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keith Ellison, Jane and John Does, Nancy Johnston, Tony Lourey, Kelly Lyn Mitchell, Paul Schnell filed by Michael R. Whipple. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Joan N. Ericksen per Civil (5th - Prisoner: Civil Detainee) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (JLB) cc: NEF to Whipple. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
