Holmes v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
| Susan E Holmes and Susan E. Holmes |
| UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
| 0:2019cv01770 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Unum Group is a corporate parent of Defendant Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Wagener, Terrance) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Wagener, Terrance) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Susan E. Holmes. Unum Life Insurance Company of America waiver sent on 7/3/2019, answer due 9/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Strand, Alesia) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 5th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 19-cv-1770 ECT/LIB. (MMG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unum Life Insurance Company of America (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6978794) filed by Susan E Holmes. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Strand, Alesia) Modified text on 7/8/2019 (MMG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
