Rogan v. Dr. Mandac
Plaintiff: Michael. Guy. Rogan
Defendant: Virginia Dr. Mandac and Virginia Mandac
Case Number: 0:2019cv01881
Filed: July 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Leo I Brisbois
Referring Judge: Katherine M Menendez
2 Judge: Patrick J Schiltz
3 Judge: John R Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. Case reassigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz and Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois for all further proceedings. Chief Judge John R. Tunheim, Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-1881 PJS/LIB. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim and Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 9/6/2019.(MMG) cc:Michael. Guy. Rogan. Modified text on 9/9/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 8 LR7.1/LR72.2 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Michael. Guy. Rogan re #5 Memorandum filed by Michael. Guy. Rogan.(JGK) Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Michael. Guy. Rogan re #5 Memorandum, #4 MOTION , #3 Notice (Other), #1 Prisoner Complaint, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Michael. Guy. Rogan(JGK) Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael. Guy. Rogan re #4 MOTION , #3 Notice (Other), #1 Prisoner Complaint, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Michael. Guy. Rogan, #5 Memorandum (JGK) Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM re #4 MOTION filed by Michael. Guy. Rogan.(JGK) Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION filed by Michael. Guy. Rogan. (JGK)Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE by Michael. Guy. Rogan (JGK) Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Michael. Guy. Rogan. (JGK)Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).
July 17, 2019 Filing 1 42 USC 1983 COMPLAINT against Virginia Dr. Mandac filed by Michael. Guy. Rogan. No summons requested. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Kate M.Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Discovery, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (JGK) cc: Rogan. Document QC'd on 8/2/2019 (MMG).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogan v. Dr. Mandac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Virginia Dr. Mandac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Virginia Mandac
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael. Guy. Rogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?