Armstrong-Morrow v. Cole et al
Mychael Anthony Armstrong-Morrow |
Luke DeHaan and Cole |
0:2020cv00147 |
January 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Katherine M Menendez |
John R Tunheim |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 EXHIBIT Addendum to Complaint re #1 Prisoner Complaint, filed by Mychael Anthony Armstrong-Morrow. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CLK) Qc'd on 2/19/2020 (KNK). |
Filing 4 RECEIPT number 44641106465 in the amount of $53.38 issued to Mychael Armstrong. (CLK) Qc'd on 2/19/2020 (KNK). |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Plaintiff Mychael Anthony Armstrong-Morrow must pay an initial partial filing fee of at least $53.38 within 20 days of the date of this order. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 1/23/2020. (KAT) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Mychael Anthony Armstrong-Morrow. (NAH) Qc'd on 1/17/2020 (KNK). |
Filing 1 42 USC 1983 COMPLAINT against Cole, Luke DeHaan filed by Mychael Anthony Armstrong-Morrow. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 6th - Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1-6, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (NAH) Qc'd on 1/17/2020 (KNK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.