Seifert et al v. IMT Insurance Company
Harmar Barbers, Inc., Kenneth Seifert d/b/a The Hair Place and Kenneth Seifert |
IMT Insurance Company |
0:2020cv01102 |
May 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David T Schultz |
John R Tunheim |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Harmar Barbers, Inc., Kenneth Seifert. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 16 (Text-Only) NOTICE TO ATTORNEY regarding Dispositive Motions briefing schedule: All dispositive motions must comply with Local Rule 7.1(c). Responses to dispositive motions shall be filed with the Court on or before 21 days after the service of the supporting memorandum to the original motion. Replies to responsive briefs shall be filed 14 days after the service of the response to the dispositive motion. Upon the motion being fully briefed and filed, counsel for the moving party shall email Chief Judge Tunheims chambers at Tunheim_Chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov to request a hearing date. Upon receiving from Chief Judge Tunheims Courtroom Deputy a hearing date, time and location, the moving party shall file the amended notice of hearing at that time. (HAZ) |
Filing 15 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. IMT Mutual Holding Company is a corporate parent of Defendant IMT Insurance Company. (Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by IMT Insurance Company.(Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Shayne M. Hamann in SUPPORT OF #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by IMT Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-J)(Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by IMT Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 11 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #9 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by IMT Insurance Company.(Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #9 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Date and time to be determined. (Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by IMT Insurance Company. (Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Shayne M Hamann on behalf of IMT Insurance Company. (Hamann, Shayne) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven J Erffmeyer on behalf of IMT Insurance Company. (Erffmeyer, Steven) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory J Duncan on behalf of IMT Insurance Company. (Duncan, Gregory) |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiffs Harmar Barbers, Inc., Kenneth Seifert. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kenneth Seifert, Harmar Barbers, Inc.. IMT Insurance Company served on 5/8/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to IMT Insurance Company. (KDS) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Civil Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 20-cv-1102 JRT/DTS. (KDS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against IMT Insurance Company (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7702470) filed by Kenneth Seifert d/b/a The Hair Place, Harmar Barbers, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.