Contreras & Metelska, P.A. v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
| Contreras & Metelska, P.A. |
| Executive Office for Immigration Review and U.S. Department of Justice |
| 0:2020cv01261 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Contreras & Metelska, P.A.. Executive Office for Immigration Review served on 5/27/2020, answer due 7/27/2020; U.S. Department of Justice served on 5/27/2020, answer due 7/27/2020. (Ratkowski, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Executive Office for Immigration Review, U.S. Department of Justice. (MMP) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherian M. Menedez. Please use case number 20-cv-1261 (SRN/KMM). (MMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Executive Office for Immigration Review, U.S. Department of Justice (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7754404) filed by Contreras & Metelska, P.A.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ratkowski, Nicholas) Modified text on 5/27/2020 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
