Janovec v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Nicole Janovec |
Equifax Information Services, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
0:2020cv01995 |
September 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Hoglund, Lauren) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Equifax Information Services, LLC response due 11/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 10/19/2020. (TMA) |
Filing 16 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Hoglund, Lauren) |
Filing 15 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Hoglund, Lauren) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Hoglund, Lauren) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicole Janovec. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 9/23/2020, answer due 11/4/2020. (Dakroub, Jenna) |
Filing 12 ORDER on #7 Stipulation. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. response due 11/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 10/5/2020.(TMA) |
Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Callie Barr for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Approved by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 10/2/2020. (JGK) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Callie Barr. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8106556 filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 9 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 Stipulation. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Nicole Janovec. (Myers, Gregory) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicole Janovec. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 9/24/2020, answer due 10/15/2020. (Dakroub, Jenna) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (kt) |
Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 20-cv-1995 SRN/ECW. (kt) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jenna Dakroub on behalf of Nicole Janovec. (Dakroub, Jenna) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Dunn on behalf of Nicole Janovec. (Dunn, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8066401) filed by Nicole Janovec. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Dunn, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.