Wolf v. Walgreen Co.
| Robert K. Wolf |
| Walgreen Co. |
| 0:2020cv02111 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Becky R Thorson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER/NOTICE: ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Confidential Letter to Court due by 7/12/2021. Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 7/5/2021. Settlement Conference set for 7/16/2021 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/30/2020.(MSK)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER/NOTICE: PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 4/16/2021. Fact Discovery due by 9/17/2021. Expert Discovery due by 12/10/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 4/16/2021. Motions (non-disp) due 10/8/2021. Motions (disp) due by 2/11/2022. Ready for trial due by 6/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/30/2020.(MSK)
|
| Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 11/24/2020. (MSK) |
| Filing 8 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Burke, Michael) |
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Walgreen Co.. Jointly Signed by Robert K. Wolf.(Burke, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T. Burke on behalf of Walgreen Co.. (Burke, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 11/24/2020 at 03:00 PM in Video Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 10/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MSK)
|
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 20-cv-2111 (PJS/BRT). (MMP) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Walgreen Co.. (Wood, Brian) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Walgreen Co.. (Wood, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8113543) filed by Walgreen Co.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (Wood, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wolf v. Walgreen Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walgreen Co. | |
| Represented By: | Brian A Wood |
| Represented By: | Michael T. Burke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert K. Wolf | |
| Represented By: | James P Carey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
