Ethen v. Floysand et al
Joseph Ethen |
Melissa Floysand, Madelyn Floysand and David Floysand |
0:2020cv02229 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Nancy E Brasel |
Katherine M Menendez |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint filed by David Floysand. (Flack, Teresa) |
![]() |
Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 Stipulation. (Flack, Teresa) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION re #5 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by David Floysand. Jointly Signed by Tony Schrank. (Flack, Teresa) |
Filing 5 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by David Floysand. (Flack, Teresa) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint filed by David Floysand, Madelyn Floysand, Melissa Floysand filed by David Floysand. (Flack, Teresa) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to David Floysand, Madelyn Floysand, Melissa Floysand. (MMG) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 20-cv-2229 NEB/KMM. (MMG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph Ethen (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8170953) filed by Joseph Ethen. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schrank, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.