Klingelhutz et al v. Security Acquisitions, LLC et al
John D. Klingelhutz and Durene D. Klingelhutz |
Landmark Acquisition, LLC and Security Acquisitions, LLC |
0:2020cv02479 |
December 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
David S Doty |
Katherine M Menendez |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 (Text-Only) NOTICE of Cancelation of Hearing: The Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 1/26/2021 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez is CANCELED. See Minutes dated 1/14/2021 for details. (KAT) |
Filing 17 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez: Status Conference held on 1/14/2021. See Minutes for details. (KAT) |
![]() |
Filing 15 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez: Status Conference held on 1/12/2021. See Minutes for details. (KAT) |
![]() |
Filing 13 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Durene D. Klingelhutz, John D. Klingelhutz . (Steinhoff, Patrick) |
Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Durene D. Klingelhutz, John D. Klingelhutz.(Steinhoff, Patrick) |
Filing 11 Declaration of Patrick B. Steinhoff in Support of #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Durene D. Klingelhutz, John D. Klingelhutz.(Steinhoff, Patrick) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Durene D. Klingelhutz. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Steinhoff, Patrick) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION . Motion Hearing set for 2/8/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge David S. Doty. (Steinhoff, Patrick) Modified text on 12/28/2020 (MMP). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Durene D. Klingelhutz. ATTACHMENTS FILED IN ERROR-WILL REFILE. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Memorandum of Law, #3 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate Certificate of Compliance, #4 Declaration of Patrick B. Steinhoff with Exhibits, #5 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion)(Steinhoff, Patrick) Modified text on 12/28/2020 (MKB). |
Filing 7 Plaintiffs' REPLY to Counterclaim filed by John D. Klingelhutz. (Steinhoff, Patrick) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick B Steinhoff on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Steinhoff, Patrick) |
Filing 5 VERIFIED ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST Plaintiffs against All Defendants. filed by Landmark Acquisition, LLC, Security Acquisitions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) WEBBER DEED TO KLINGELHUTZ, #2 Exhibit(s) FED 29 2012 QUIT CLAIM DEED, #3 Exhibit(s) 2009 QUIT CLAIM DEED KLINGELHUTZ DEV TO KLINGELHUTZ) (Elliott, Christopher) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Landmark Acquisition, LLC, Security Acquisitions, LLC Notice of Removal Filed With Carver County District Court (Elliott, Christopher) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 20-cv-2479 (DSD/KMM). (lmb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Verified from Carver County District Court, case number 10-CV-20-866 (filing fee $402, receipt number AMNDC-8281894) filed by Landmark Acquisition, LLC, Security Acquisitions, LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Elliott, Christopher) Modified text on 12/7/2020 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.