Rivera v. GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp.
| Ruben Rivera |
| GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp. |
| 0:2020cv02649 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| John R Tunheim |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp.. Jointly Signed by Ruben Rivera.(Hargreaves, Colin) |
Filing 7
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. In recognition of the current efforts locally and nationally to protect persons from unnecessary potential exposure to COVID-19, the Pretrial Scheduling Conference in this case will be held by telephone. A call-in number will be provided by the Court. The parties are not required to conduct any applicable meet and confers in person. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 1/13/2021. (HAM)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 2/23/2021 at 10:00 AM in Judge's Chambers 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 12/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) (with Jury Demand) filed by GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp.. (Douglas, Bruce) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 20-cv-2649 (JRT/TNL). (lmb) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Douglas, Bruce) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp.. (Douglas, Bruce) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court (filing fee $402, receipt number AMNDC-8336020) filed by GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Douglas, Bruce) Modified text on 12/23/2020 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivera v. GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ruben Rivera | |
| Represented By: | Scott Moriarity |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GAF Building Materials Manufacturing Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Colin H. Hargreaves |
| Represented By: | Bruce J Douglas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
