Carebourn Capital, L.P. v. Darkpulse, Inc.
| Carebourn Capital, L.P. |
| Darkpulse, Inc. |
| 0:2021cv00288 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Hennepin County District Court; enclosing Order of Remand. cc: Hennepin County District Court re #20 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court. (kt) |
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 2/17/2021. (RJE)
|
| Filing 19 First Declaration of Chip Rice in Support of #8 First MOTION to Remand to State Court Memorandum filed by Carebourn Capital, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Madgett, David) |
| Filing 18 Reply to Response to Motion re #8 First MOTION to Remand to State Court Memorandum filed by Carebourn Capital, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Madgett, David) |
|
Filing 17
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Plaintiff Carebourn Capital, L.P.'s reply and attachments #16 are STRICKEN for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1(l) and 28 U.S.C. 1746. Carebourn may re-file its reply and attachments no later than February 10, 2021. Ordered by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 2/9/2021. (SMP)
|
| Filing 16 STRICKEN PER 17 ORDER: Reply to Response to Motion re #8 First MOTION to Remand to State Court Memorandum filed by Carebourn Capital, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Declaration of Fact, #3 Exhibit A to Declaration of Fact)(Madgett, David) Modified text on 2/10/2021 (kt). |
|
Filing 15
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Mark R Basile for Darkpulse, Inc.; granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Eric Benzenberg for Darkpulse, Inc.; granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Marjorie Santelli for Darkpulse, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 2/5/2021. (NAH)
|
| Filing 14 EXHIBIT Index of Exhibits to Defendant's Response to Order to Show Cause re #13 Response filed by Darkpulse, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6)(Asmus, Jason) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE re #11 Order to Show Cause filed by Darkpulse, Inc..(Asmus, Jason) |
| Filing 12 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. (See order for details) Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 2/3/2021. (RJE)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Marjorie Santelli. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8459306 filed by Darkpulse, Inc.. (Weber, Jordan) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Carebourn Capital, L.P..(Madgett, David) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Carebourn Capital, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Madgett, David) Modified text on 2/3/2021 (kt). |
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Carebourn Capital, L.P.. (Madgett, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Eric J. Benzenberg. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8458198 filed by Darkpulse, Inc.. (Asmus, Jason) Modified text on 2/3/2021 (MKB). |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mark R. Basile. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8458181 filed by Darkpulse, Inc.. (Asmus, Jason) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER that #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Plaintiff Carebourn Capital, L.P. is/are not properly before this court and therefore denied without prejudice. In order to be considered, any motion previously filed in state court must be refiled in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this District. Orders entered by the state court prior to removal remain in effect. Approved by the Court on 2/2/2021. (kt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Carebourn Capital, L.P.. (kt) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-288 WMW/DTS. (kt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court, case number 27-CV-21-1173 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8457470) filed by Darkpulse, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 (Summons and Verified Complaint), #2 Exhibit(s) 2 (State Court Civil Coversheet), #3 Exhibit(s) 3 (TRO Motion), #4 Exhibit(s) 4 (1-30-21 Email), #5 Exhibit(s) 5 (Notice of Filing Notice of Removal), #6 Exhibit(s) Civil Cover Sheet) (Asmus, Jason) |
| NOTICE re #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested : originally filed in Hennepin County District Court. (kt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
