Jackson v. U.S. Marshals et al
| Ronald Jermaine Jackson |
| Joel L. Brott and U.S. Marshals |
| 0:2021cv00369 |
| February 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ronald Jermaine Jackson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 3/17/2021.(KAT) |
| Filing 4 RECEIPT number 44641110019 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Ronald Jackson. (MMG) Document QC'd by JME on 3/4/2021 (JME). |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Ronald Jermaine Jackson re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Ronald Jermaine Jackson (JGK) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ronald Jermaine Jackson re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (JGK) . Qc'd on 3/10/2021 (KNK). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Ronald Jermaine Jackson. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Kate M. Menendez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s) Appeal Bond, #3 Envelope) (JGK) Qc'd on 3/10/2021 (KNK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
