Lozoya v. City of Cloquet et al
| Clarence Lozoya |
| County of Carlton, Carey Ferrell, Scott Beckman, City of Cloquet and Does 1-25 inclusive |
| 0:2021cv00990 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER - 1.The parties' Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint [Docket No. #13 ] is APPROVED; and 2.The Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by June 15, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 5/6/2021.(JLB)
|
|
Filing 14
PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #13 Stipulation,. (Hruby, Vicki)
|
|
Filing 13
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by County of Carlton. Jointly Signed by Clarence Lozoya, City of Cloquet, Carey Ferrell, and Scott Beckman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Order Sealing-Expunging Records, #2 Exhibit B - Stipulation to Unseal Records)(Hruby, Vicki)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Vicki A Hruby on behalf of County of Carlton. (Hruby, Vicki)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph E Flynn on behalf of County of Carlton. (Flynn, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica E Schwie on behalf of City of Cloquet, Carey Ferrell. (Schwie, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Mark P Hodkinson on behalf of Scott Beckman. (Hodkinson, Mark)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Kenneth Frucht for Clarence Lozoya. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 4/26/2021. (NAH)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clarence Lozoya. Scott Beckman served on 4/15/2021, answer due 5/6/2021; City of Cloquet served on 4/15/2021, answer due 5/6/2021; County of Carlton served on 4/15/2021, answer due 5/6/2021; Carey Ferrell served on 4/16/2021, answer due 5/7/2021. (Parker, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 6
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Frederick J. Geonetta. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8683587 filed by Clarence Lozoya. (Parker, Andrew) Modified text on 4/29/2021 (NAH).
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kenneth N. Frucht. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8683566 filed by Clarence Lozoya. (Parker, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 4
(Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Kenneth N. Frucht as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MKB)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Scott Beckman, City of Cloquet, County of Carlton, Does, Carey Ferrell. (MKB)
|
|
Filing 2
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (5th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 21-cv-990 (ECT/LIB). (MKB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8682643) filed by Clarence Lozoya. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Parker, Andrew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
