Esch et al v. Advocare International, LP
Plaintiff: Mark Esch and Sarah Esch
Defendant: Advocare International, LP
Case Number: 0:2021cv01228
Filed: May 17, 2021
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Referring Judge: John R Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (Text-Only) ORDER on #5 Stipulation. The parties' stipulation is approved. The Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before 7/22/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/7/2021. (BJP)
June 7, 2021 Filing 7 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing J. Sean Lemoine as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (kt) cc: J. Sean Lemoine. (kt)
June 7, 2021 Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Extend Time to Answer #5 Stipulation. (Davick, Andrew)
June 7, 2021 Filing 5 STIPULATION Extend Deadline to Answer by Mark Esch, Sarah Esch. Jointly signed by Advocare International, LP. (Davick, Andrew) Modified text on 6/7/2021 (kt).
June 4, 2021 Filing 4 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-DIRECTED TO REFILE. STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint by Mark Esch, Sarah Esch. (Davick, Andrew) Modified text on 6/4/2021 (lmb).
May 17, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Advocare International, LP. (MMP)
May 17, 2021 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 21-cv-1228 (JRT/KMM). (MMP)
May 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Advocare International, LP (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8756970) filed by Mark Esch, Sarah Esch. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davick, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Esch et al v. Advocare International, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Esch
Represented By: Ava Marie M Cavaco
Represented By: Andrew L Davick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Esch
Represented By: Ava Marie M Cavaco
Represented By: Andrew L Davick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advocare International, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?