U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kleyman
Plaintiff: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Howard S Kleyman
Case Number: 0:2021cv01943
Filed: August 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Referring Judge: Wilhelmina M Wright
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2021 Filing 9 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(MMG)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER APPROVING CONSENT JUDGMENT. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 10/7/2021. (RJE)
September 1, 2021 Filing 7 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE)
August 31, 2021 Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #2 MOTION for Entry of Judgment filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.(Guardi, Ariella)
August 31, 2021 Filing 5 EXHIBIT 1 Consent of Howard S. Kleyman re #2 MOTION for Entry of Judgment filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.(Guardi, Ariella)
August 30, 2021 Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Jonathan A. Epstein as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (CLK)
August 30, 2021 Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Antitrust, Securities) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 21-cv-1943 WMW/KMM. (CLK)
August 30, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Entry of Judgment filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments FILED IN ERROR: #1 Exhibit(s) Consent of Howard S. Kleyman, #2 Exhibit(s) Proposed Order)(Guardi, Ariella) Modified text on 8/31/2021 (KNK).
August 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Howard S Kleyman filed by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Guardi, Ariella)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kleyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Ariella O. Guardi
Represented By: Charles J Kerstetter
Represented By: Craig R Baune
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard S Kleyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?