Gekonge v. Kijakazi
| Violet Gekonge |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 0:2021cv02105 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Violet Gekonge. (kt)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Moss on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. (Moss, Michael)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Violet Gekonge. (kt) Qc'd on 11/18/2021 (KNK).
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Violet Gekonge. Kilolo Kijakazi served on 10/18/2021, answer due 12/17/2021. (MTP) Document QC'd on 11/17/2021 (MTP).
|
|
Filing 9
(Text-Only) Notice to Parties: The clerk's office has prepared and sent the service packets to the U.S. Marshal Service for service of process per #7 Order. Plaintiff does not need to file a Summons Returned Executed. (lmb)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi. (lmb)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 10/8/2021. (EB)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Clifford Michael Farrell for Violet Gekonge. Approved by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/28/2021. (JGK)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (kt)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT-ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung per Social Security List. Please use case number 21-cv-2105 TNL. (kt)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Clifford M. Farrell. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9041864 filed by Violet Gekonge. (Olson, Edward)
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Violet Gekonge. (Olson, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi filed by Violet Gekonge. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olson, Edward)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gekonge v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Violet Gekonge | |
| Represented By: | Edward C. Olson |
| Represented By: | Clifford Michael Farrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
| Represented By: | Michael Moss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
