Artan v. Garland et al
| Hawo Muse Artan |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony Blinken and Peggy Petrovich |
| 0:2021cv02112 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Peggy Petrovich. (lmb) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-2112 (ECT/DTS). (lmb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Antony Blinken, Peggy Petrovich, filed by Hawo Muse Artan. Filer requests summons issued. Receipt Number AMNDC-9043160 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hines, Kelsey) Modified text on 9/24/2021 (lmb). |
| Filing 1 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9043160) filed by Hurfe Abdidhahir Abdulle. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hines, Kelsey) Modified text on 9/24/2021 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
