Keller Industrial, Inc. v. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. et al
Keller Industrial, Inc. |
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company |
0:2021cv02218 |
October 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John F Docherty |
Eric C Tostrud |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 Summons Issued as to Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company. (JME) |
Filing 23 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Zurich American Insurance Company. filed by Keller Industrial, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Bond, #2 Exhibit(s) Subcontract, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Amended Civil Cover Sheet - Keller) (Kubes, Kristine) |
Filing 22 ORDER to Allow Amended Complaint and Correct Caption on #21 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/30/2021.(TJS) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION re #19 Proposed Order to Judge to allow Amended Complaint and correct caption by Keller Industrial, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint redline amended complaint)(Kubes, Kristine) |
Filing 20 (Text-Only) ORDER regarding #18 Stipulation. The Court has received the parties' stipulation to amend the complaint. Because no redline copy of the amended complaint was submitted, even though required by Local Rule 15.1(b)(2), the Court cannot be sure that the stipulation affects only the case caption. If this amendment affects only the case caption, the parties shall confirm that to the Court in a joint filing and the Court will then sign and docket an Order Amending the Complaint. If the proposed amendment affects more than the case caption, then a redline copy of the proposed amended complaint shall be filed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/29/2021.(TJS) |
Filing 19 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #18 Stipulation,. (Kubes, Kristine) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION to allow Amended Complaint and correct caption by Keller Industrial, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Stipulated Amended Complaint)(Kubes, Kristine) |
Filing 17 ORDER/NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report and confidential letters due by 12/13/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/2021 at 03:00 PM via Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 26(f) Template, #2 Consent Form)(TJS) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Keller Industrial, Inc.. filed by Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A) (Shapiro, Paul) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (Peake, Ernest) |
Filing 14 ORDER on #12 Stipulation. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. answer due 11/17/2021; Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland answer due 11/17/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/12/2021.(TJS) |
Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Shapiro, Paul) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Jointly Signed by Keller Industrial, Inc.. (Shapiro, Paul) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by Keller Industrial, Inc. Notice per court Order to ECI (Attachments: #1 Court's Order 11/10/2021)(Kubes, Kristine) |
Filing 10 ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/10/2021.(TJS) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick J Lindmark on behalf of Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (Lindmark, Patrick) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ernest F Peake on behalf of Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (Peake, Ernest) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Shapiro on behalf of Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (Shapiro, Paul) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keller Industrial, Inc.. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland served on 10/12/2021, answer due 11/2/2021. (Kubes, Kristine) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keller Industrial, Inc.. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. served on 10/12/2021, answer due 11/2/2021. (Kubes, Kristine) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT of Keller Group plc as corporate parent for Plaintiff Keller Industrial, Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Keller North America, Inc. (Kubes, Kristine) Modified text on 10/25/2021 (kt). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (MMP) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 21-cv-2218 (ECT/JFD). (MMP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9070374) filed by Keller Industrial, Inc. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Bond, #2 Exhibit(s) Subcontract, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kubes, Kristine) Modified text on 10/8/2021 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.