United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
United HealthCare Services, Inc. |
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Gilead Holdings, LLC, Gilead Sciences, LLC, Gilead Sciences Ireland UC and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. |
0:2021cv02331 |
October 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Nancy E Brasel |
Tony N Leung |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE: Case transferred from Minnesota has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:21-cv-09202, filed 11/29/2021. (kt) |
Filing 13 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE: This case has been transferred/extracted to the Northern District of California. (KNK) |
Filing 12 ORDER. The stipulation by the parties is approved and this case is transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 11/19/2021. (KMW) |
Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 Stipulation,. (Bornstein, William) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Transfer to Northern District of California by United HealthCare Services, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Gilead Sciences, Inc., Gilead Holdings, LLC, Gilead Sciences, LLC, Gilead Sciences Ireland UC, and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. (Bornstein, William) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United HealthCare Services, Inc.. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. (Bornstein, William) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United HealthCare Services, Inc.. Gilead Sciences, LLC served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. (Bornstein, William) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United HealthCare Services, Inc.. Gilead Holdings, LLC served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021. (Bornstein, William) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United HealthCare Services, Inc.. Gilead Sciences, Inc. served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. (Bornstein, William) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Gilead Holdings, LLC, Gilead Sciences Ireland UC, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Gilead Sciences, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (MMP) |
Filing 5 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Hamish P.M. Hume, Abby L. Dennis, Edward H. Takashima, Beko Reblitz-Richardson, Judith A. Zahid, Eric W. Buetzow, James S. Dugan as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMP) |
Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd,4th Antitrust, Securities list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 21-cv-2331 (NEB/TNL). (MMP) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Plaintiff United HealthCare Services, Inc.. (Bornstein, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9092887) filed by United HealthCare Services, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bornstein, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.