Zins v. United States of America
| David Zins |
| United States and United States of America |
| 0:2021cv02420 |
| November 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Zins (Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Bahram Samie on behalf of United States of America. (Samie, Bahram) |
| Filing 5 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Federal Tax Suits) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 21-cv-2420 (ECT/ECW). (MKB) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by David Zins re #1 Petition (in a Civil Case), #3 Affidavit in Support (Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #1 Petition (in a Civil Case) . (Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Petition (in a Civil Case) filed by United States filed by David Zins. (Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 1 PETITIONto Quash Summons against United States (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9120247) filed by David Zins. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A) (Johnson, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
