Young v. Bosch
Petitioner: Divaunte K. Young
Respondent: Warden Guy Bosch
Case Number: 0:2021cv02598
Filed: December 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Referring Judge: Nancy E Brasel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2022 Filing 9 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal, #2 Appeal Packet)(kt)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Young's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability will be issued. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 3/10/2022.(KMW)
January 27, 2022 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #4 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Divaunte K. Young filed by Divaunte K. Young, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Divaunte K. Young. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 1/27/2022.(LNP)
December 22, 2021 Filing 6 RECEIPT number 44641112751 in the amount of $5.00 issued to MCF Stillwater - Divaunte K. Young. (MMP)
December 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Young is ordered to show cause within 30 days of the date of this order why his petition should not be denied without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. Failure to respond to this order to show cause will result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 12/20/2021.(LNP)
December 20, 2021 Filing 4 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Divaunte K. Young. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(MMP)
December 3, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (LNP)
December 2, 2021 Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Divaunte K. Young re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Young (NAH)
December 2, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Divaunte K. Young. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (NAH) Document QC'd on 1/28/2022 (MTB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Bosch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Divaunte K. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Guy Bosch
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?