Kuklenski v. Medtronic USA, Inc.
Jan Kuklenski |
Medtronic USA, Inc. |
0:2022cv00438 |
February 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John F Docherty |
Eric C Tostrud |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 REPLY re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Medtronic USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Mrkonich, Marko) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Jan Kuklenski. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Halunen, Clayton) |
Filing 10 (Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. Due to the pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 5), the Court finds there is good cause to delay the entry of a pretrial scheduling order. The Court will schedule a pretrial conference, if needed, promptly after a decision is issued on the pending motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 3/10/2022.(TJS) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #5 Motion to Dismiss/General. (Mrkonich, Marko) |
Filing 8 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #5 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Medtronic USA, Inc..(Mrkonich, Marko) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Medtronic USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Mrkonich, Marko) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #5 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Motion Hearing set for 5/31/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3B (STP) before Judge Eric C. Tostrud. (Mrkonich, Marko) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Medtronic USA, Inc.. (Mrkonich, Marko) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Jan Kuklenski re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued as to Medtronic USA, Inc. (Halunen, Clayton) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Medtronic USA, Inc. (MMP) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 22-cv-438 (ECT/JFD). (MMP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medtronic USA, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9333958) filed by Jan Kuklenski. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Halunen, Clayton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kuklenski v. Medtronic USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jan Kuklenski | |
Represented By: | Pamela M Spera |
Represented By: | Clayton D Halunen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Medtronic USA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Claire B. Deason |
Represented By: | Daniel Bihrle |
Represented By: | Marko J Mrkonich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.