Remme v. Kijakazi
| Richard Remme |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 0:2022cv02586 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 (Text-Only) Notice to Attorney - Local Rule Change re Social Security Actions:The Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) establish new briefing deadlines for all Social Security actions filed on or after December 1, 2022. For Social Security Actions filed before December 1, 2022, the deadlines previously established by local rule continue to apply: Unless granted an extension, the plaintiff must file his or her opening brief within 60 days of the filing of the answer and administrative record; the Commissioner must file a responsive brief within 45 days of the filing of plaintiffs opening brief; and the plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of the Commissioners filing of the responsive brief. (JML) |
Filing 7
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Bryan Konoski for Richard Remme. Approved by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 11/22/2022. (KMO)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney BRYAN KONOSKI. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9907690 filed by Richard Remme. (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Richard Remme. Kilolo Kijakazi served 10/25/22. Answer due 12/27/2022. (Greeman, James) Modified text on 10/26/2022 (CLK). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (ABR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi. (ABR) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Ony) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois per Social Security List. Please use case number 22-cv-2586 (LIB). (ABR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9832115) filed by Richard Remme. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Greeman, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Remme v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Remme | |
| Represented By: | James H Greeman |
| Represented By: | Bryan Konoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
| Represented By: | James D. Sides |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
