NGI Capital, Inc. et al v. Chubb Custom Insurance Company
NGI Capital, Inc. doing business as Apex IT and Eric Christopher Rapp |
Chubb Custom Insurance Company |
0:2022cv02964 |
November 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-2964 (SRN/TNL).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (KNK) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Chubb Custom Insurance Company. (Wiegert, Joel) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Chubb Custom Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, (Wiegert, Joel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington County District Court (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9911660) filed by Chubb Custom Insurance Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint Exhibit A, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wiegert, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.