Williams v. Raimondo et al
Robert D. Williams |
Gina M. Raimondo and Carlton M. Hadden |
0:2022cv03152 |
December 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Katherine M Menendez |
David T Schultz |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Lucas B. Draisey on behalf of Carlton M. Hadden, Gina M. Raimondo. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Draisey, Lucas) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Carlton M. Hadden, Gina M. Raimondo. (KNK) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA. Gina M. Raimondo through the US Attorney's Office in their official capacity: Gina M. Raimondo served on 2/7/2023, answer due 4/10/2023. (ACH) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Carlton M. Hadden, Gina M. Raimondo. (MKB) |
Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Order Granting IFP and USM Forms to Complete cc: Williams. (MKB) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Robert D. Williams. (JGK) Document QC'd on 1/4/2023 (CLK). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carlton M. Hadden, Gina M. Raimondo filed by Robert D. Williams. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Kate M. Menendez per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (JGK) Document QC'd on 1/4/2023 (CLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.