Gurung v. Kijakazi
| Lachhi Maya Gurung |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 0:2023cv03050 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Douglas L Micko |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
(Text-Only) ORDER. Before the Court is Defendant's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Finding good cause supports her request, the Court grants Defendant a 60-day extension. Defendant shall have until 1/30/2024, to file the certified administrative record or otherwise plead in this action. Should Defendant be able to provide the certified administrative record prior to that date, Defendant will file the certified administrative record as soon as possible to avoid further delay. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 12/4/2023. (JLD)
|
| Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Doroba, Sophie) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Kilolo Kijakazi. (Doroba, Sophie) |
| Filing 6 SEALED SERVICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER by Plaintiff. (Osterhout, Karl) |
|
Filing 5
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Karl E. Osterhout for Lachhi Maya Gurung. Approved by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 10/3/2023. (jam)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (kt) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Ony) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko per Social Security List. Please use case number 23-cv-3050 DLM. (kt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Karl E. Osterhout. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-10572437 filed by Lachhi Maya Gurung. (Olson, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-10572422) filed by Lachhi Maya Gurung. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olson, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gurung v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lachhi Maya Gurung | |
| Represented By: | Edward C. Olson |
| Represented By: | Karl E. Osterhout |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
| Represented By: | James D. Sides |
| Represented By: | Sophie Doroba |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
