Wright v. O'Malley et al
| Ashley Dawn Wright |
| Martin J. O'Malley |
| 0:2024cv01596 |
| May 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #7 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 6/11/2024. (TJS)
|
| Filing 12 SEALED EXHIBIT re #11 Sealed Response to Order to Show Cause by Ashley Dawn Wright. (ABR) Document QC'd on 06/12/24 by MMP. Modified text on 6/12/2024 (MMP). |
| Filing 11 SEALED RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #9 Order to Party File Document/Respond to Court by Ashley Dawn Wright. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ABR) Document QC'd on 06/11/24 by MMP. Modified text on 6/12/2024 (MMP). |
| Filing 10 SEALED EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint by Ashley Dawn Wright. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ABR) Document QC'd on 6/3/2024 (MKB). |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 5/17/2024. (ALM)
|
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT re #7 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Ashley Dawn Wright.(ABR) |
| Filing 7 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Ashley Dawn Wright. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ABR) |
| Filing 6 ORIGINAL SIGNATURE PAGE re #1 Complaint filed by Ashley Dawn Wright. (ABR) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 cc: Ashley Dawn Wright (jam) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Ashley Dawn Wright (jam) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Ashley Dawn Wright re #2 Exhibit, #1 Complaint (jam) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT re #1 Complaint filed by Ashley Dawn Wright.(jam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley filed by Ashley Dawn Wright. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty per Civil (MJ all -Social Security Appeals) list. (jam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wright v. O'Malley et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ashley Dawn Wright | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley | |
| Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
| Represented By: | Sophie Doroba |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
