King v. Belinger et al
| Arron Scott King, Sr |
| Trisha Williams and Belinger |
| 0:2024cv02701 |
| July 12, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF DOCKETING CORRECTION #4 Judgment. Added updated Civil Notice-Appeal and Appeal Packet 1983 and remailed to plaintiff. (JME) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal, #2 Appeal Packet)(JME) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/25/2024: #3 Updated Civil Notice-Appeal and Updated Appeal Packet 1983) (JME). |
Filing 3
ORDER: This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 7/23/2024.(RMM)
|
| Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: Arron Scott King, Sr (jam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Belinger, Trisha Williams filed by Arron Scott King, Sr. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 5th - Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jam) Document QC'd on 8/22/2024 (ACH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
