DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.
DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC |
Medtronic, Inc. |
0:2024cv04091 |
October 31, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Jeffrey M Bryan |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 17 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint) filed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC.(Werner, Todd) |
Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint) filed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. (Attachments: #1 FILED IN ERROR: REFILE SEPARATELY [Proposed] Order)(Werner, Todd) Modified text on 11/27/2024 (kt). |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. Medtronic, Inc. served on 11/13/2024, answer due 12/4/2024. (Werner, Todd) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Alex G. Patchen. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-11475287 filed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. (Werner, Todd) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David G. Liston. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-11475286 filed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. (Werner, Todd) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Gina K. Kim. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-11475285 filed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. (Werner, Todd) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ronald Abramson. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-11475281 filed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. (Werner, Todd) |
Filing 6 (Text-Only) Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Ronald Abramson, David G. Liston, Alex G. Patchen, Gina K. Kim as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MKB) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Medtronic, Inc. (MKB) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Patent) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 24-cv-4091 (JRT/ECW).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Werner, Todd) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or any subsidiaries to report for DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. (Werner, Todd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medtronic, Inc. (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-11461399) filed by DiLorenzo Biomedical, LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Werner, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.