Shumpert v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
| Danny Shumpert, Jr. |
| Minnesota Department of Corrections and Paul Schnell |
| 0:2025cv00239 |
| January 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Douglas L Micko |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute; and Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs be denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 2/24/2025. (jme) |
Filing 3
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO PAY INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE within 21 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 1/23/2025. (jme)
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Danny Shumpert, Jr. (jam) Document QC'd on 2/3/2025 (JME). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Minnesota Department of Corrections, Paul Schnell filed by Danny Shumpert, Jr. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per 3rd, 4th - Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. (Attachments: #1 Addendum, #2 Envelope) (jam) Document QC'd on 2/3/2025 (JME). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
