Taylor v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Betty Jean Taylor
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2009cv00283
Filed: November 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Presiding Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by David A. Sanders on 9/9/10. (ncb, USDC)
May 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Remand to SSA. The clerk will enter a separate judgment. Signed by David A. Sanders on 5/25/10. (ncb, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Jean Taylor
Represented By: Angela Dee Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?