Robertson v. Family & Urgent Care Clinic, P.A.

Plaintiff: Leigh Ann Robertson
Defendant: Family & Urgent Care Clinic, P.A.
Case Number: 1:2014cv00218
Filed: November 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Aberdeen Division Office
County: Lee
Referring Judge: S. Allan Alexander
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 AGREED ORDER dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 5/17/2016. (dbm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robertson v. Family & Urgent Care Clinic, P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leigh Ann Robertson
Represented By: Richard Shane McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Family & Urgent Care Clinic, P.A.
Represented By: Margaret Sams Gratz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?