Hendrick v. ITT Corporation

Plaintiff: Philip A. Hendrick
Defendant: ITT Corporation
Case Number: 1:2016cv00204
Filed: November 10, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Aberdeen Division Office
County: Oktibbeha
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Referring Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER denying 49 Motion in Limine without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 11/27/2018. (kab)
February 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 39 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/12/2018. (adm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hendrick v. ITT Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philip A. Hendrick
Represented By: Elizabeth Ford Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ITT Corporation
Represented By: Eileen Kuo
Represented By: James H. Stock, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?