Jones v. Booth et al
| Morkiter Jones |
| Unknown Defendants A-Z, Jared Booth and City of Columbus, Mississippi |
| 1:2018cv00193 |
| November 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| David A Sanders |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Separate ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Defenses by City of Columbus, Mississippi. (Turnage, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Jared Booth. (Morris, Bradford) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bradford Keith Morris on behalf of Morkiter Jones City of Columbus, Mississippi served on 12/5/2018. (Morris, Bradford) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Jared Booth and City of Columbus, Mississippi (jla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jared Booth, City of Columbus, Mississippi; returned via USPS. (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0537-1612949, filed by Morkiter Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Claim, #2 Exhibit B - Media Accounts of Incident, #3 Exhibit C - City Counsel Minutes, #4 Exhibit D - Media Account of Suspension, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
