Smith v. Rivera et al
| D. Smith |
| Job Reyes Rivera, Unknown Co-Conspirator #1, Brett Watson and Shameka Horton |
| 1:2019cv00151 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Sharion Aycock |
| Roy Percy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 (RENEWED MOTION) Supplement to Motion re #5 MOTION to Appoint US Marshal to Serve Summons and Complaint filed by D. Smith. (jla) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED / SUPPLEMENT TO DOCUMENT Amendment to #1 Complaint. (jla) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Shameka Horton. (Davis, Stuart) |
| Filing 6 Supplement to Motion re #5 MOTION to Appoint US Marshal to Serve Summons and Complaint filed by D. Smith. (jla) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint US Marshal to Serve Summons and Complaint by D. Smith. (jla) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Shameka Horton, Job Reyes Rivera, Brett Watson; returned to plaintiff for service via SASE. (jla) |
| Filing Fee Received: $ 400, receipt number MSN300024599 (tab) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Pseudonymously by D. Smith. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand,, filed by D. Smith. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
