Ware v. State of Mississippi et al
| David Ware |
| The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Lynn Fitch and State of Mississippi |
| 1:2020cv00028 |
| February 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Michael P Mills |
| Roy Percy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jerome Prewitt (Doc #3 ) (jla) Modified on 3/6/2020 (jla). |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Order,, Set Deadlines,, Terminate Motions,. (cb) |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #4 Order,, Set Deadlines,, Terminate Motions, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Acknowledgment filed by State of Mississippi, The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Lynn Fitch. (Owens, Jerrolyn) |
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Ware; and directing State to Respond - State of Mississippi answer due 5/4/2020; The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Lynn Fitch answer due 5/4/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 2/19/20. (cb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Mills and Magistrate Judge Percy. (cb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Ware. (cb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Chickasaw), filed by David Ware. (cb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
