Buford v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Plaintiff: Priscilla Buford
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Does 1-10
Case Number: 1:2021cv00142
Filed: September 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Referring Judge: David A Sanders
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to State Court Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (filed in state court, see Doc #3 ) (jla)
September 13, 2021 Filing 3 STATE COURT RECORD - REMOVAL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued to Walmart, #4 Summons Return on Walmart, #5 Walmart's Answer and Affirmative Defenses, #6 Walmart's NOS - 1st INT to PL, #7 Walmart's NOS - 1st RFP to PL, #8 Walmart's NOS - 1st RFA to PL, #9 Entry of Appearance for Walmart by Rajita Iyer Moss, #10 Plaintiff's NOS - Responses to RFA, #11 Plaintiff's NOS - INT-RFP to Walmart, #12 Plaintiff's NOS - Responses to INT-RFP, #13 Walmart's Notice of Filing NOR) (Moss, Rajita)
September 9, 2021 Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against John Does 1-10, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, filed by Priscilla Buford. (jla)
September 9, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP from Clay County Circuit Court, case number 21-CV-0092K. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSNDC-1997494) Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 5(b) and the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing for the Northern District of Mississippi, the removing defendant must electronically file a copy of the entire state court record within 14 days of the date of removal. The state court record will be filed using the event State Court Record - Removal. Attach the Notice/Certificate of Filing State Court Record as the main document with each state court document attached as a separate PDF. All attachments must be clearly identified. The state court record can not be filed conventionally., filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Responses to Requests for Admissions, #3 Exhibit C - Copies of Process, Pleadings served on Walmart, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla)
September 9, 2021 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buford v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Priscilla Buford
Represented By: R. Gregg Rogers
Represented By: Shanda M Yates
Represented By: Yancy Brian Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Represented By: Rajita Iyer Moss
Represented By: Thomas M. Louis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?