Rakestraw v. Cadence Bank et al
| Charles Robison Rakestraw |
| Cadence Bank and Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 1:2022cv00067 |
| April 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Neal B Biggers |
| Glen H Davidson |
| Roy Percy |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. Response due by 7/7/2022. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 6/22/2022. (kbt) (Main Document 19 replaced on 6/22/2022) (kbt).
|
| Filing 18 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #17 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Charles Robison Rakestraw. (Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 17 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Charles Robison Rakestraw. (Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Settlement by Brian Kelly Herrington on behalf of Charles Robison Rakestraw (Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Cadence Bank. (Rushing, Stevie) |
| Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Cadence Bank. (Rushing, Stevie) |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE STATEMENT . (Rushing, Stevie) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Erin Diane Saltaformaggio on behalf of Cadence Bank (Saltaformaggio, Erin) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stevie Farrar Rushing on behalf of Cadence Bank (Rushing, Stevie) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Case Management Conference set for 7/19/2022 10:00 AM in Oxford Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/31/22. (rtc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Equifax Information Services LLC answer due 6/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/25/2022. (yf)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE STATEMENT . (Parrott, Evan) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or other Response to Complaint by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Parrott, Evan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Kelly Herrington on behalf of Charles Robison Rakestraw Cadence Bank served on 5/18/2022. (Herrington, Brian) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Kelly Herrington on behalf of Charles Robison Rakestraw Equifax Information Services LLC served on 5/6/2022. (Herrington, Brian) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Sharion Aycock recused. Case reassigned to Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 5/2/22. (jla)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Sharion Aycock for all further proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 5/2/22. (jla)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Cadence Bank, Equifax Information Services LLC; emailed to Attorney for service. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2088595, filed by Charles Robison Rakestraw. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Davidson and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
