Clanton v. Delta and Pine Land Company
Plaintiff: Robert Clanton
Defendant: Delta and Pine Land Company
Case Number: 2:2008cv00110
Filed: June 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Personal Property: Other Office
County: Bolivar
Presiding Judge: Michael P. Mills
Presiding Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER denying 23 Motion for Reconsideration on 22 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court,,,,,,. Signed by Michael P. Mills on 11/21/08. (lpm, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clanton v. Delta and Pine Land Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Clanton
Represented By: Mitchell H. Tyner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Delta and Pine Land Company
Represented By: Stephen Lee Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?